Before an article is accepted for publication, it has to be reviewed by researchers involved in the same field (referees).

  • 0

Before an article is accepted for publication, it has to be reviewed by researchers involved in the same field (referees).

Before an article is accepted for publication, it has to be reviewed by researchers involved in the same field (referees).

The main characteristic of an academic or scholarly paper is that it has to pass an academic quality assessment before it could be published in an academic journal (the DEFSA website is an authorised ePublication). This control process is known as peer-reviewing and it is designed to guarantee the academic standard of an article.

What exactly is an academic research paper?

An academic paper is not a social commentary, an opinion or a “blog”. An academic paper starts with a thesis – the author of the academic paper aims to persuade readers of a concept or means to fix a challenge predicated on EVIDENCE – not opinion that is personal.

Academic writing should present your reader with an argument that is informed. To create an argument that is informed you must first attempt to sort out what you know about a topic from that which you think or feel about an interest. You can start by posing a relevant question which will result in your idea (in which case, your idea will be the reply to your question), or you can make a thesis statement. Or you can do both: you are able to ask a question and immediately suggest the answer that your essay will argue.

The study process is certainly not simply collecting data, evidence, or “facts,” then copy-and-pasting” this preexisting information into a paper. Instead, the study process is all about investigation —asking questions and developing answers through serious critical thinking and reflection that is thoughtful. Most research involve at least a survey or questionnaire soliciting opinions from a sample that is reasonably-sized of participants.

How are Academic Papers assessed?

  1. May be the Full Paper an reflection that is accurate of title, abstract and keywords?
  2. Does the paper clearly state the nagging problem, outcomes, findings or conclusions. Could be the structure of the paper logical and clear?
  3. Does the paper clearly define the methodology, research tools and research questions?
  4. Does the paper include sufficient theory that is relevant is such knowledge clearly portrayed and correctly cited?
  5. Does this paper present knowledge that is new insights, and suggest future work in the field of design education.
  6. Are any right parts of the paper weak or lacking, and exactly how could these be improved?
  7. Have ethical requirements been addressed, including the way the research was conducted.
  8. Does the paper stick to the style guidelines?

In addition, papers presented at DEFSA Academic conferences are evaluated in a Double Blind Peer Review up against the criteria that are following

  1. Does the paper address the conference theme?
  2. Does the paper contribute to Design Education (or closely related) focus areas? It’s important to remember that papers must address issues linked to design education such as for example knowledge production, curriculum, assessment and pedagogy, and never designing or even the design profession.
  3. Does the paper present an academically sound argument that contributes to research output that is original?
  4. The abstract contains a short summary of this article along with a description associated with the objective, method, result and conclusion associated with the study. Keywords (or subject words), which identify the contents of the article, may also be given within the abstract. An abstract is between 300 and 500 words.

    A Full Paper can contain as much as 5 000 words, and consists of the immediate following:


  5. Briefly describe the main focus for the paper that is overall its main points
  6. Highlight background information or issues required to understand the direction of the paper. The evaluator might never be from your own field of design.
  7. Define any terminology that is key to know the topic
  8. Finish with your thesis statement
  9. Research Method and material

    • The methodology and methods should be reasonable for and appropriate to this which is being studied.
    • Identify the methods used to recognize and locate sources and also the rationale useful for selecting the sources to analyse. The detail must certanly be sufficient so that the research process may be assessed, and reproduced by future researchers.
    • Give an explanation for procedures useful for analysing the info and coming to findings.


    • Important information is given textual form preferably using tables and figures. Even unexpected or negative answers are presented.

    Discussion where can i buy essays online

    • The discussion is an assessment for the results. Methodological considerations as well as the real way in which the outcomes compare to earlier research in the field are discussed.


    • Restate your thesis through the introduction in various words
    • Briefly summarise each point that is main in the body of this paper (1-2 sentences for each point). Give a statement of this consequences of not embracing the career (argumentative paper only)
    • End with a strong clincher statement: a suitable, meaningful final sentence that ties the complete point for the paper together


    • All documents mentioned in the article ought to be included in the bibliography so that the reader is able to refer to the sources that are original.